Helping you to think your way to an excellent life!
Critical Path Analysis
Force Field Analysis
At the end of each solution line, consider the results. If the result of taking that decision is uncertain, draw a small circle. If the result is another decision that needs to be made, draw another square. Squares represent decisions, circles represent uncertainty or random factors. Write the decision or factor to be considered above the square or circle. If you have completed the solution at the end of the line, just leave it blank.
Starting from the new decision squares on your diagram, draw out lines representing the options that could be taken. From the circles draw out lines representing possible outcomes. Again mark a brief note on the line saying what it means. Keep on doing this until you have drawn down as many of the possible outcomes and decisions as you can see leading on from your original decision.
An example of the sort of thing you will end up with is shown below:
Once you have done this, review your tree diagram. Challenge each square and circle to see if there are any solutions or outcomes you have not considered. If there are, draw them in. If necessary, redraft your tree if parts of it are too congested or untidy.
You should now have a good understanding of the range of possible outcomes.
Next look at each circle (representing an uncertainty point) and estimate the probability of each outcome. If you use percentages, the total must come to 100% at each circle. If you use fractions, these must add up to 1. If you have data on past events you may be able to make rigorous estimates of the probabilities. Otherwise write down your best guess.
This will give you a tree like the one below:
Note that the tree looks less confused when different colours are used for numbers than for the structure of the tree.
We start on the right hand side of the decision tree, and work back towards the left. As we complete a set of calculations on a node (decision square or uncertainty circle), all we need to do is to record the result. All the calculations that lead to that result can be ignored from now on - effectively that branch of the tree can be discarded. This is called 'pruning the tree'.
In the example above, the value for 'new product, thorough development' is:
0.4 (probability good outcome) x $500,000 (value) = $200,000
0.4 (probability moderate outcome) x $25,000 (value) = $10,000
0.2 (probability poor outcome) x $1,000 (value) = $200
--------
$210,200
This is shown across our example tree in the diagram below:
Note that the values calculated for each node are shown in the boxes.
Sunk costs, amounts already spent, do not count for this analysis.
When you have calculated the benefit of each decision, select the decision which has the largest benefit, and take that as the decision made and the value of that node.
Calculation of decision nodes in our example is shown below:
In this example, the benefit we previously calculated for 'new product, thorough development' was $210,000. This example shows that we calculate the cost of this approach as $75,000. This gives a net benefit of $135,000. The benefit of 'new product, rapid development' was $15,700. On this branch we therefore choose the most valuable option, 'new product, thorough development', and allocate this value to the decision node.
Critical Path Analysis
Force Field Analysis
Return to Mind Tools home page
© Mind Tools Ltd., 1995-8